Page 1 of 1
BUT THEY HAD BETTER STATS!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 16:38
by Tenzin
Don't act like you're not impressed!
Re: BUT THEY HAD BETTER STATS!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 16:41
by Kiel Barat
Comment about tight pants #1.
Re: BUT THEY HAD BETTER STATS!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 16:43
by Lisszia
It's just... I can't find the words, lol.
Tight pants they are I must admit that.
Re: BUT THEY HAD BETTER STATS!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 17:09
by BadJawa
Wotcha everyone,
It's not just the haircut that's high and tight.
Good job, Trooper. Carry on.
Cheers,
Hawley.
Re: BUT THEY HAD BETTER STATS!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 18:16
by JenDoon
Was is especially cold in there?
/wink
Re: BUT THEY HAD BETTER STATS!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 18:43
by Tenzin
Hey it's average...
I checked...
Re: BUT THEY HAD BETTER STATS!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 19:09
by JenDoon
Tenzin wrote:Hey it's average...
I checked...
*hands Tenzin a sock*
Re: BUT THEY HAD BETTER STATS!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2011 07:18
by Nekxyu
Tight.
Re: BUT THEY HAD BETTER STATS!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2011 07:35
by Kaetha
Aren't you supposed to have a budgie in budgie smugglers?
Re: BUT THEY HAD BETTER STATS!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2011 10:06
by Zenkutsu
I blame steroids.