Now, most people who finished the game know that the ending is, well, pretty bad and it's a feeling shared by many fans.
I just thought I'd share this with all of you.
First of all there is this: https://twitter.com/#!/masseffect/statu ... 0568926209
And then there is this theory people have been coming up with: http://w11.zetaboards.com/Theorycraftng ... 7688087/1/
Make sure to click the "Spoiler: Click to toggle".
That tweet and the all the really odd points about the ending that is pointed out in the second link makes you wonder.
The renegade option to destroy the reapers (shown with Andersson for some reason) which as we are told will kill all synthetics including Shepard as he is partially synthetic being the only ending where we get the short scene showing Shepard is alive (and so is EDI).
The "child" and dreams that actually match known symptoms of reaper indoctrination, the strange piles of bodies during the last run to the conduit, the dream trees in the last stretch, the gun with unlimited ammo, seeing Normandy thrown out of a relay jump (why would it be in a jump to begin with) and have everyone be stranded on some planet and look happy about it and let's not forget that none of your companions should have been on the Normandy since they were all on earth, the list goes on but I think you get the point that thread is trying to make
![Razz :p](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
Maybe there is more coming (the tweet sure indicates as much) maybe we aren't quite done yet as weird as it might seem. Then again, maybe I, and a lot of other people, are just in deniable about the ending and are trying to rationalize it away
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)